Buy & Sell Volume to Price Pressure

Buy & Sell Volume to Price Pressure

This indicator has been translated from TradingView. Credits and thanks go to the original author Ricardo M Arjona @XeL_Arjona. It compares Buying & Selling Pressure and offers 3 ways to present the result. After you import the “itf” file, you tick one of the boxes (and only one).

  • “vmacd” is the option by default which presents the Buy to Sell Convergence/Div Oscillator
  • “vinv” is the option which presents Buy to Sell Conv/Div as Cumulative
  • “norm” is the option which presents the Normalised (Filtered) data

Detailed description by the author is in the bottom of the indicator.

Enjoy!

Share this

Risk disclosure:

No information on this site is investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Trading may expose you to risk of loss greater than your deposits and is only suitable for experienced investors who have sufficient financial means to bear such risk.

ProRealTime ITF files and other attachments : How to import ITF files into ProRealTime platform?

PRC is also on YouTube, subscribe to our channel for exclusive content and tutorials

  1. DELBERT • 09/05/2022 #

    Bonjour , et merci pour le partage , j’ai un message d’erreur sur la ligne 216 signe 28 , par quoi remplacer la virgule SVP ( je suis sur PRT 10.3 ) Merci pour votre réponse et bonne journée .

    • Khaled • 09/05/2022 #

      As this section of the forum is in English, I’ll reply in English. I’m using PRT v11, so I d’ont have any error. Can you please post a screenshot of the error message? Or else try to replace all the instructions of color (“red”), etc. with (255,0,0) in line 216

      return (1-vmacd)*round(SPcon,0) style(histogram) coloured(255,0,0) as “Selling”

  2. sal157011 • 09/05/2022 #

    Don’t understand where it says: “Volume Pressure Histogram: Columns plotted in positive are considered the dominant Volume Force for the given period. All “negative” columns represents the counterforce Vol.Press against the dominant.”
    In the above picture at the beginning day 26 8:00 the columns are negative and so is a counterforce against the dominant but for me the dominant force is negative. Can you explain this better? Thank you.

    • Khaled • 09/05/2022 #

      Not sure to understand the question. However, the columns (Histogram) represent the variable “VPH”, which is lagging behind VPO1 and VPO2. So, you might have VPO1 and VPO2 negative while VPH is still positive. A bar or two later VPH will catch up.

avatar
Register or

Likes

avatar avatar avatar avatar avatar avatar avatar avatar avatar avatar avatar
Related users ' posts
Nicolas Thanks for contributing to the "ichimoku section" of the prorealtime code library Don't he...
sourberry Thank you , this is a great indicator works beautifully. Could you kindly modify to scr...
pp_playaflamenca Excuse me,... reading your code about spanB: [ SenkouSpanBFutureW = (Highest[SenkouSpanPerio...
Nicolas
8 years ago
Better Volume
Better Volume
39
Indicators
Keyeming Hello Nicolas; not sure to undersntad line 167, and in the video I d'ont remember that the a...
Nicolas I don't know, this code is 6 years old and I made a 1:1 translation of the provided code by ...
Alai-n https://emini-watch.com/free-stuff/volume-indicator/
Nicolas
9 years ago
Nicolas You will find the VWAP code from PRT here: https://www.prorealcode.com/topic/is-there-any-wo...
keks Thanks for sharing this wonderful code. Is there a way to draw a horizontal line to plot pre...
taklause Hello, just one question, can it be that this indicator does not work on ProRealTime v12? T...
Nicolas
9 years ago
Up on Big Volume
Up on Big Volume
0
Screeners
Nicolas
9 years ago
Nicolas
9 years ago
Nicolas
9 years ago
Nicolas Just replace the last line with this : RETURN dm as "Volume Weighted MACD", masignal as "Si...
thomas2004ch I happen to read this article. I would say the formel 'd = maslow - mafast' could be inverse...
Nicolas You are right! but still the picture is looking good. The formula is inverted! dunno why :) ...

Top