Dax M5 – Ichimoku strategy with 3 timeframes

Dax M5 – Ichimoku strategy with 3 timeframes

Hello,
I share my first strategy. Ichimoku is fashionable actually. So I tried to parameter a strategy on the Dax in m5 with a filter on UT, m15 and H1.
Taking losses and letting go of your winnings is the idea for TP and SL management.
The leverage is 5×1 € and a spread of 2. Test from January 2018 to now.
Good test and thank you for your feedback.

(google traduction, je suis français)

Share this

Risk disclosure:

No information on this site is investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Trading may expose you to risk of loss greater than your deposits and is only suitable for experienced investors who have sufficient financial means to bear such risk.

ProRealTime ITF files and other attachments : How to import ITF files into ProRealTime platform?

PRC is also on YouTube, subscribe to our channel for exclusive content and tutorials

  1. Nicolas • 07/15/2019 #

    Good job, thanks for sharing!

  2. Gregg • 07/15/2019 #

    Nice strategy, I will test it!

  3. AE • 07/15/2019 #

    Thanks! How can check with 200k bars?

  4. AE • 07/15/2019 #

    who*

  5. Gregg • 07/15/2019 #

    Hi there,
    here is a 200k units for this strategy. It’s strange, it seems that the strategy was worse at first but much better then …
    https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2019/29/2/1563283533-backtest-ichimoku-16-07-2019.png

    • Nicolas • 07/15/2019 #

      Typical OOS backtest. Sign of survivor bias usually popup in OOS period.

    • tba69 • 07/15/2019 #

      hello, actually it’s a lot less pretty as a startup. I am amazed at the difference that there can be following the periods … What do you mean typical OOS backtest ?

    • Nicolas • 07/15/2019 #

      Out Of Sample period. Period that you didn’t use to develop/optimize your strategy.

    • Nicolas • 07/15/2019 #

      @tba69 That’s ok, the strategy is good IMO, thanks again for sharing 🙂

  6. tba69 • 07/15/2019 #

    Is it possible to have more than 200K bars ?

    • Nicolas • 07/15/2019 #

      Yes with V11, up to 1M bars!

  7. winnie37 • 07/15/2019 #

    what do you mean, Nicolas?

    • Nicolas • 07/15/2019 #

      You should do your homework about ‘survivor bias’, ‘overfitting’, ‘robustness’, 🙂

    • winnie37 • 07/15/2019 #

      that was i was thinking about… 🙂

  8. tba69 • 07/15/2019 #

    I think I got excited too fast … will IG go to version 11 soon?

    • Nicolas • 07/15/2019 #

      Once beta is over, they should be able to upgrade to v11. I’m confident that it will happen this year.

  9. fatlung • 07/15/2019 #

    Will anyone please test it on 0.1% absolute stoploss; and MFE of 0.5% (applied on high rather than close), the whole story seems more comfortable.

    • tba69 • 07/15/2019 #

      The strategy has been “optimized” with a low success rate but with a high ratio.

  10. fatlung • 07/15/2019 #

    Also, I would like to know the timezone applied on this strategy. Thanks

    • tba69 • 07/15/2019 #

      I’m on Paris timezone.

  11. frenqle • 07/15/2019 #

    I changed stoploss to 15 and profit to 90. looks good on the 1 minute, but i can not backtest further than april..

    • fatlung • 07/15/2019 #

      I see your rationale, but i am afraid the win rate is a bit too low to stand and keep running the strategy so it would be great if somebody could modify the strategy, striking a better balance between win rate and the profit . (IMO only no offence)

    • tba69 • 07/15/2019 #

      Indeed the success rate is very low, it is only offset by the ratio of x10 between the SL and the TP.

  12. Littefrido • 07/15/2019 #

    Hello everyone, I allowed myself to change TP and SL and the results are really good on 200k bars.

    IF achat and Time Chat and not onmarket and toto = 0 THEN
    toto = 1
    Buy n shares at market
    SET STOP pLOSS 62
    SET TARGET pPROFIT 150
    ENDIF

    IF vente and TimeVente and not onmarket and toto = 0 THEN
    toto = 1
    Sellshort n shares at market
    SET STOP pLOSS 16
    SET TARGET pPROFIT 274
    ENDIF

    Check it out.

  13. Littefrido • 07/15/2019 #

    Immagini
    https://ibb.co/52sBK5j
    https://ibb.co/0DTVjcB
    https://ibb.co/02HKRs0

  14. snucke • 07/15/2019 #

    have anyone tested this live? and how does it perform?

    • Gubben • 07/15/2019 #

      I liked the idea so much I put it early into live and it took 19 straight losses before hitting a win. So far 5% win with G/L of 0.62, but it also has an open position in profit today so if we’re lucky it breaks profitable today.
      Looking at back tests I managed to set it live right after a win and before the regular drawdown which turned out longer than previous ones. I like the strategy so I have faith and will let it run for now.

    • Gubben • 07/15/2019 #

      Since july 24th it’s doing well. Started with a longer drawdown than expected but now it’s 12% win rate and 1.77 G/L . It’s had 4 of those big winners. I’ve tried finding other instruments to try it on but no luck so far. I’ve tried one on OMX30 and although the gain/loss came out similar it’s 60% time in market so doesn’t feel as neat.

  15. Tony87 • 07/15/2019 #

    Gubben do we have a progress report?

    • Gubben • 07/15/2019 #

      So far so good. After a long drawdown it was winning four times in five weeks. Since 24 july, 46 trades, 4 wins, 42 losses. Worst trade was almost 4 times the average I guess because of a weekend gap so could have gone the other way too. 8,7% winrate, 1.18 G/L. It has 15 losers in a row now so statistically it should take one home soon. It was really close to taking another win but instead it went down to a loss. I know Grahal thinks one should help the bots sometimes and maybe here I should have done that. In anyway, it looks good so far to me.

      I am also running a variant on OMX but that one has a different stop loss approach and is much more in market unfortunately. It is profitable so far though, but needs more time to tell cause it doesn’t take trade

  16. pat95162 • 07/15/2019 #

    Salut
    Pourquoi je n’ai pas les même résultats que vous

  17. UkCoopDownUnder • 07/15/2019 #

    Any hints for us, on which variables we should be optimising ?
    As of November 2020, the current settings make big losses,
    Thanks

avatar
Register or

Likes

avatar avatar avatar avatar avatar avatar avatar avatar avatar avatar avatar avatar avatar avatar avatar avatar

+6 more likes

Related users ' posts
Reiner
9 years ago
Nicolas You should join and read the forum thread about this strategy. There are plenty of different...
Reiner Hi djtaktik and welcome, I have answered your question in the related Pathfinder forum beca...
danver34 is this version the definitive one or from the original one have there been modifications to...
Reiner
9 years ago
Nicolas Overfit on past history obviously. But it doesn't mean that it would still underperformed in...
Francesco78 Thank you for the clarifications Nicolas, I am more aware of the meaning of the backtesting ...
CanAny1Trade Hi all, could a simple indicator be made to mark the traditional Pit based ORB? I'm tryi...
Fabio Anthony Terrenzio this strategy works only in a well defined trend
brosly Good afternoon I am trying to get the complete code of lex strategy made by adolfo since I s...
dreif123 hi Adolfo, is Alex Auto Trading Botindex working on DAX as well ? if so , can you post the...
hvluthy@sunrise.ch I'm very interested to try out your strategy, but as a bloody newbie I need some help regard...
Scalp Hola Adolfo, tengo una variante de tu estrategia, pero no se programar, me puedes ayudar al ...
ALZ Hi, I tested this strategy and that doesn't work.. strategy is losing.. Does anyone curr...
mcha bonjour, merci pour cet échange mais il me semble que ce twist des SSA  et SSB serait plus ...
Pasq Concernant la remarque précédente, il est possible de remplacer les 2 lignes de code de cett...
Nicolas Merci Pasq. On peut retrouver ce code corrigé sur le forum, je viens d'en retrouver un exemp...
Nicolas Ahah, I'm not the author of this one :) I know you are a great coder Wilko, why don't you p...
Wilko Thanks for the flattery! I will, I promise.  /F
Nicolas Still don't have seen anything from your own :) You promised me! Ahaha 
Andres Uffff, I didn't adjust the different index spreads. With the heavy spread of Italy It's nega...
davidp13 Good day. I know this was posted such a long time ago, but I though rebuilding the system on...
davidp13 Also to note that the one position in my code does not close the other, which as far as I kn...
Dave Hi, I'm new to coding and have been trying to modify the code a little to backtest an idea I...
Nicolas Better use the forums for coding assistance please. You'll get more results there for sure.
Dave Apologies - only just learning the site layout. Maybe you could delete the post?
Ronny Should C5 = Chikou > SSpanA[26] and Chikou > SSpanB[26] be C5 = Chikou > SSpanA and...
Emperor.it Chikou = close[26] it's a mistake. Chikou Span is today's closing moved back 26 periods. It...
Nicolas Indeed, there is a mistake in that code. It is often the case when using Ichimoku and its tr...
Olivier7 // Original code // Ichimoku Tenkan-Kijun Cross (screener) // https://www.prorealcode.com/...
ipbvba erreur dans le code en ligne 2
mvinter Hi Doctrading im trying to use your tenkansen Kijunsen crossover screener but keep getting ...
Nicolas FR/Bonjour Steftonio, non pas de frais overnight calculé sur la durée du backtest, c'est une...
avatar
Anonymous Any reason why in 2016 this system is doing very bad respect the previous years?
Nicolas "very bad" is relative to the account equity. I do not forward test this strategy since I po...

Top