Ok cheers Robert that’s straight forward enough.

I would comment that if a prgoram recognises a prgogram statement and there is contextual help in the program that its important to know what the statement is read as, as much as explaining =, < <= etc, which is as self-explanatory, things like pipsize or pointsize which the program recognises should be written into the programs contextual help, because they are statements that the program recognises, yet there is no obvious reference to see how the program interprets it. I’d argue that its not enough to say its common sense, because so is <, =, or <= etc, so perhaps lets see it incorporated into any update, along with anything else I am probably unaware of if anyones looking.. 🙂

Thanks again.. still trawling through code in my spare time, but have stumbled on a few interesting anomalies through making mistakes that actually work better than the common sense approach when backtesting.