Breakout M5 / H4 Nasdaq
Forums › ProRealTime English forum › ProOrder support › Breakout M5 / H4 Nasdaq
- This topic has 96 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 2 years ago by murre87.
-
-
11/04/2021 at 8:32 PM #18099111/04/2021 at 9:07 PM #180993
you could try it, but I think it will just delay the opening and buy at a worse price.
might make sense with a shorter TF but a new 4 hour high, in conjunction with the rising MA, is a fairly significant move by itself – you can see that it works!
11/05/2021 at 9:56 AM #18101411/05/2021 at 10:15 AM #18101511/05/2021 at 10:31 AM #181018the trailing stop I use is Paul’s work (which I think was based on Nicolas’s)
the main difference is that it works with cumulative orders true or false
It also has a more subtle way of calculating the trailing step, and a choice of how to trigger it (close, high, low, typicalprice)
Both the start and the step are in percentages, in this case it goes to breakeven at 0.39% – approx 64 points. This is unusually high but it seems to work, normal setting would be between 0.2 – 0.3%
I have mine on demo, opened a trade yesterday, still in play.
The stop itself doesn’t need a min distance, but tick the box for ‘Readjust stops’ when you launch it.
1 user thanked author for this post.
11/05/2021 at 12:23 PM #18102511/05/2021 at 12:32 PM #181029A short version of this setup would be interesting.
11/05/2021 at 12:42 PM #181034Unfortunately, I cannot afford version V4.4T. 😉 It is good to see, however, that there are no unforeseen events and that the principle therefore works well. I tested the V2 on the M15 yesterday to have a longer test period … and it works. Even if I still prefer EMA15 in the H4.
11/05/2021 at 1:14 PM #18103911/05/2021 at 1:19 PM #181041Even if I still prefer EMA15
Hmm, why would you prefer it when it works less well? Irrational bias is disastrous in this game!
as for the v4.4, some people are put off by cumulative orders but potential rewards are so much greater. All my best algos use it, but you have to really trust your entry conditions.
In this case, the drawdown looks high, but relative to the max runup it’s not that bad. My rule of thumb is to have a minimum ratio of 10:1 between those two
11/05/2021 at 1:23 PM #181042What do i write in “max position”
Are you using MM = 1 ?
11/05/2021 at 1:32 PM #181043sorry. Wrong picture. Yes I meant when MM=1 and:
MM123456789101112131415if MM thenMinSize = 0.5 // IG minimum position size allowedMaxSize = 2000 // IG tier 2 margin limitProfitAccrued = 0 // when restarting strategy, enter profit or loss to date in instrument currencyDD = 2984 //MinSize drawdown in instrument currencyMultiplier = 3 //drawdown multiplierCapital = DD * MultiplierEquity = Capital + ProfitAccrued + StrategyProfitPositionSize = Max(MinSize, Equity * (MinSize/Capital))if positionsize > MaxSize thenpositionsize = MaxSizeendifPositionSize = Round(PositionSize*100)PositionSize = PositionSize/100ENDIF11/05/2021 at 1:53 PM #181044actually for demo purposes you can put any large number for max positions, like 200 or 2000 – you wont get anywhere near that so it doesn’t matter.
Note that the MM works on the ratio between Minsize and DD. So in this case, if you want to start with Minsize = 1, you should also put DD = 5968
The Multiplier controls how fast positionsize will increase. 3 is fairly safe, I sometimes use 2 … depends on your attitude to risk.
11/05/2021 at 2:28 PM #18104611/05/2021 at 2:48 PM #181048do you mean with cumulative orders? so each cross above the 4h candle opens another position?
-
AuthorPosts
Find exclusive trading pro-tools on