Strategy Robustness Tester

Vonasi · Sun, 01 Sep 2019 12:34:14 +0000

Following on from a discussion elsewhere regarding walk forward testing I had the idea to create a bit of code that you can add to any strategy and see how it would have performed if you had traded on only odd days or only on even days, or odd or even months or odd and even years or any combination of the three. By comparing the output of all 23 tests we can get an idea of how consistently a strategy makes profit. The gain figure in the optimisation results should be ignored as the number of trades for each test will be very different. The average gain per trade, win rate and equity curve for each test can tell us a lot about the strategies robustness though. You just add the code to the start of your strategy code and then insert the extra condition ‘and tradeon’ in the conditions whenever you send buy or sellshort orders to the market. Then just optimise with a variable ‘choice’ with values 0 to 22 step 1. Then just click on each result in the optimisation report to see the equity curve for each test. Here is the code to add to the start of your strategy in case it is of use to anyone: //Day Month and Year Robustness Tester //By Vonasi //20190901 //0 = all days //1 = odd days only //2 = even days only //3 = odd months only //4 = even months only //5 = even years only //6 = odd years only //7 = odd days in odd months only //8 = even days in even months only //9 = even days in odd months only //10 = odd days in even months only //11 = even months in even years only //12 = odd months in odd years only //13 = even months in odd years only //14 = odd months in even years only //15 = odd days in odd months in odd years only //16 = even days in even months in even years only //17 = even days in odd months in odd years only //18 = odd days in even months in even years only //19 = odd days in even months in odd years only //20 = even days in odd months in even years only //21 = even days in even months in odd years only //22 = odd days in odd months in even years only oddday = opendayofweek mod 2 = 1 evenday = opendayofweek mod 2 = 0 oddmonth = openmonth mod 2 = 1 evenmonth = openmonth mod 2 = 0 oddyear = openyear mod 2 = 1 evenyear = openyear mod 2 = 0 tradeon = 0 if choice = 0 then tradeon = 1 endif //odd days only if choice = 1 and oddday then tradeon = 1 endif //even days only if choice = 2 and evenday then tradeon = 1 endif //odd months only if choice = 3 and oddmonth then tradeon = 1 endif //even months only if choice = 4 and evenmonth then tradeon = 1 endif //even years only if choice = 5 and evenyear then tradeon = 1 endif //odd years only if choice = 6 and oddyear then tradeon = 1 endif //odd days in odd months only if choice = 7 and oddday and oddmonth then tradeon = 1 endif //even days in even months only if choice = 8 and evenday and evenmonth then tradeon = 1 endif //even days in odd months only if choice = 9 and evenday and oddmonth then tradeon = 1 endif //odd days in even months only if choice = 10 and oddday and evenmonth then tradeon = 1 endif //even months in even years only if choice = 11 and evenmonth and evenyear then tradeon = 1 endif //odd months in odd years only if choice = 12 and oddmonth and oddyear then tradeon = 1 endif //even months in odd years only if choice = 13 and evenmonth and oddyear then tradeon = 1 endif //odd months in even years only if choice = 14 and oddmonth and evenyear then tradeon = 1 endif //odd days in odd months in odd years only if choice = 15 and oddday and oddmonth and oddyear then tradeon = 1 endif //even days in even months in even years only if choice = 16 and evenday and evenmonth and evenyear then tradeon = 1 endif //even days in odd months in odd years only if choice = 17 and evenday and oddmonth and oddyear then tradeon = 1 endif //odd days in even months in even years only if choice = 18 and oddday and evenmonth and evenyear then tradeon = 1 endif //odd days in even months in odd years only if choice = 19 and oddday and evenmonth and oddyear then tradeon = 1 endif //even days in odd months in even years only if choice = 20 and evenday and oddmonth and evenyear then tradeon = 1 endif //even days in even months in odd years only if choice = 21 and evenday and evenmonth and oddyear then tradeon = 1 endif //odd days in odd months in even years only if choice = 22 and oddday and oddmonth and evenyear then tradeon = 1 endif Then alter your strategy code to use the TRADEON variable so that trades are only opened if the day, month and year meet the test criteria. if (your long entry conditions) and tradeon then buy 1 contract at market endif if (your short entry conditions) and tradeon then sellshort 1 contract at market endif

This topic has 161 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 3 years ago by Roger.

Tagged: casino, robustness, walk forward

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 162 total)

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 →

01/19/2020 at 3:21 PM #117209

Vonasi

i’m glad that the have you tried switching it off and then switching it back on again?’ worked. You may not have liked the next suggestion which would have involved a hammer and a few sharp blows.

What is a good result? Well one where the strategy does not fall apart just because you open trades randomly is a good starting point. As for particular scores – well that is down to each individual and the more strategies you test the more idea you will get as to what to expect. The simple answer is that a completely level line is the absolute ideal result but you will never achieve this so you will personally have to decide how far from this perfect line you are willing to accept.

My robustness test is not superior nor inferior to WF analysis – both should be used to try to gauge how robust a strategy is. In fact the perfect combination is to develop a strategy on an in sample section of data and then carry out a robustness test on a section of out of sample data. If all tests are profitable and you would have been happy to have traded every equity curve in the test then that is a very good indication that the strategy could be a good one.

1 user thanked author for this post.

nonetheless

Vonasi

Moderator

Topics: 192

Replies: 5088

Been thanked: 1811 times

01/19/2020 at 6:32 PM #117222

Paul

a new test to have more comparison data;

Info about strategy; re-entry on same signal in same direction (close&re-enter), reversal on signal, stoploss 2%, trailingstop, spread 1. DAX 5 minutes 200k bars.

pics strategy without tradeon & last pic with robustness test results.

Paul

Participant

Topics: 40

Replies: 812

Been thanked: 660 times

02/25/2020 at 11:01 AM #120401

Francesco

Hello Vonasi, coming from GoldMiner topic i found out about this tester.
I’m about to integrate this to all my strategy and i have just one question: what kind of tester is the more complete of the ones you posted? The RANDOM version?

Thanks and congrats for your work!

Francesco

Participant

Topics: 32

Replies: 439

Been thanked: 200 times

02/25/2020 at 1:15 PM #120431

Francesco

Another question, once i’ve got the averages between 10 10 20 5 and 21 5, what is the minimum acceptable value for the total average?

Then, after the robustness test, i have to pick the best choice of qty and random for the strategy or i have to disable the tradeon and run the strategy as before the test?

Thank you.

Francesco

Participant

Topics: 32

Replies: 439

Been thanked: 200 times

02/25/2020 at 3:42 PM #120467

Vonasi

I think the random one does a good robustness test but any robustness test is better than no test at all! It also has the benefit of lots of different varied test sequences and that Excel and Google sheets have already been created so that we can loo at the results in way that helps with the analysis of them.

I think you misunderstand how it works. You must have a finished strategy with any variables fixed to what you would run the strategy live with. It is not an optimisation tool but a tool to test a finished strategy. All the results are results that you could potentially get just by letting the strategy trade in ‘random’ sequences.

Vonasi

Moderator

Topics: 192

Replies: 5088

Been thanked: 1811 times

02/25/2020 at 4:40 PM #120474

Francesco

I understood how it worked, that was just a very silly question caught up in discovering the tool for the first time 😀

And for the minimum acceptable value for the total average? 50+ would be good?

Francesco

Participant

Topics: 32

Replies: 439

Been thanked: 200 times

02/25/2020 at 4:56 PM #120479

Vonasi

Francesco wrote:

And for the minimum acceptable value for the total average? 50+ would be good?

This has been asked before further back in the topic. Everyone has to judge their own personal levels that they are happy to call robust.

1 user thanked author for this post.

Francesco

Vonasi

Moderator

Topics: 192

Replies: 5088

Been thanked: 1811 times

02/25/2020 at 5:06 PM #120481

Francesco

I had 23 systems that i tought were amazing judging by the backtests positives on all years on 200k… then after robustness test only 7 of them were over an average of 50 (that i believe is acceptable combined with excellent results on 200k)
This makes me think about the power of this tool that can optimize the portfolios into only real valid strategies.
Congratulations again for your hard work 🙂

1 user thanked author for this post.

Bard

Francesco

Participant

Topics: 32

Replies: 439

Been thanked: 200 times

02/25/2020 at 5:13 PM #120482

Vonasi

Yes it is very easy to create a strategy that has a lovely equity curve but while it has an open position you have no idea what trades you are missing and they could all be losers but you just lucked out and started your back test on the right candle. If we shake things up a bit and trade a bit randomly then we get to see all the trades that we curve fitted out by starting on a certain candle.

Keeping a record of all the scores of all your tests is a good idea and as you say you can then cherry pick the most robust and have the best chance of them working in the future. Do bear in mind that we are robustness testing on exactly the same data that we developed our strategy on which is not ideal. An even better way to test is to break our data into in sample and out of sample and develop the strategy on the IS and then robustness test it on the IS and then do the same on the OOS and compare. A strategy that performs as well on the OOS and passes a robustness test on the OOS has a very strong chance of working in the future.

1 user thanked author for this post.

Francesco

Vonasi

Moderator

Topics: 192

Replies: 5088

Been thanked: 1811 times

02/26/2020 at 8:36 AM #120523

jebus89

Hi, would love to use this but i cant get it to work 🙁

First of all, im attempting GraHal’s ITF file containing this code:

//Robustness Tester - Random
//By Vonasi
//20190909
 
StartDate = 0
Qty = QTY //10
Random = Random // 3
 
once j = 0
once flag = 1
 
if flag = 1 then
j = j + 1
if j > qty then
flag = -1
j = j - 1
endif
endif
 
if flag = -1 then
j = j - 1
if j = 0 then
j = j + random
flag = 1
endif
endif
 
tradeon = 0
if opendate >= startdate then
if barindex mod qty = 0 or barindex mod qty = j then
tradeon = 1
endif
endif

//Robustness Tester - Random

//By Vonasi

//20190909

StartDate = 0

Qty = QTY //10

Random = Random // 3

once j = 0

once flag = 1

if flag = 1 then

j = j + 1

if j > qty then

flag = -1

j = j - 1

endif

if flag = -1 then

j = j - 1

if j = 0 then

j = j + random

flag = 1

endif

tradeon = 0

if opendate >= startdate then

if barindex mod qty = 0 or barindex mod qty = j then

tradeon = 1

endif

Is this the right one? I just add this and where i buy i add “and tradeon” and i set variables qty 2-20 and random 1-10?

In the excel file i cant understand 3 things:

Why is there an X and T optimized here?
Why is the excel file only for 45 rows?? Arnt you supposed to do 100?
When i copy paste/drag results to excel i get all sorts of wrong formats? Like “% of winners” just says #FIELD! and a bunch of my avg gain just turns into dates. How are you guys using this so easy? I dont understand how to use it even by reading Vonasi’s guide for dummies lol. guess im special huh

Please help, i wanna try this..

jebus89

Participant

Topics: 118

Replies: 586

Been thanked: 238 times

02/26/2020 at 8:42 AM #120524

jebus89

So i found the link for grahals spreadsheet and this worked much better than vbonasis excel file because copy paste worked here, but its still only for 45 (10-5?)

Edit: Can this be right?

I first dragged the avg gain per trade sorted low-> high, then i dragged and dropped the avg win rate low -> high

jebus89

Participant

Topics: 118

Replies: 586

Been thanked: 238 times

02/26/2020 at 10:50 AM #120539

jebus89

Yo sorry for spamming this topic, but im wondering, if what ive done is correct, what can you guys tell from these tests in my screenshot?

I got 2 different systems on 1H Wall st, next to them is the “new” version of the system, im still running the 2 original ones, but i kind of want to switch to newer version, im just not sure if its OK to switch or not.

Based on results from the robust tester: Would you switch systems? (note that Rush V3 buys 2 contracts instead of just 1, if a “turbofilter” is engaged. thats why avg gain per trade is alot higher than rush v2 – this increases the max drawdown by about 70% but almost 90% more profit..)

Thanks.

jebus89

Participant

Topics: 118

Replies: 586

Been thanked: 238 times

02/26/2020 at 11:24 AM #120542

nonetheless

I wouldn’t expect to see much difference between them based just on those results. If I had to pick just one then I’d go with the new version of each, but you’d have to look at other factors, WF performance, profit, drawdown, regularity etc…

nonetheless

Participant

Topics: 83

Replies: 1237

Been thanked: 978 times

04/01/2020 at 6:19 PM #124275

nonetheless

Hi Vonasi, thanks again for creating this excellent tool — if only it were incorporated into the optimization engine, so that one could optimize for robustness instead of profit. That would be a game changer.

Anyway, I just wanted to check that I’ve properly understood the logic behind the random VRT. For example, if we took 2 identical algos, start one and it takes a trade. While it is on market, we start the other one and it takes a different trade. Obviously, for algos that are on market a high % of the time they will have completely different trajectories because of the different starting point; so far so good.

But what about the same scenario with an algo that is only on market for maybe 25% of the time? Wouldn’t the two of them synchronise quite quickly, perhaps by the second trade, and therefore both produce more or less the same result as a straight back test? or am I missing something else here?

nonetheless

Participant

Topics: 83

Replies: 1237

Been thanked: 978 times

04/01/2020 at 7:47 PM #124281

Vonasi

Firstly a robustness test allows you to check that your strategy is not curve fitted due to its starting candle.

Secondly a robustness allows you to test some of the trades that you missed while your original backtest already had trades open.

Thirdly even if you had no missed trades or the tests get into sync quite quickly a robustness test allows you to see what the equity curve would be if you hit a whole bunch of bad trades compared to if you hit a whole bunch of great trades. Your best and worst results in the robustness test will give you an idea of the best and worst to expect from your strategy.

1 user thanked author for this post.

nonetheless

Vonasi

Moderator

Topics: 192

Replies: 5088

Been thanked: 1811 times

Author

Posts

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 162 total)

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 →

Find exclusive trading pro-tools on