Discussion re Pure Renko strategy
- This topic has 345 replies, 24 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by
.
-
Maybe that would be great to update value of boxsize with ATR
https://towardsdatascience.com/renko-brick-size-optimization-34d64400f60e
1 user thanked author for this post.
In order to open positions following the trend, i added bullish and bearish conditions to the Paul’s last version, performances up to +33%
1234567EMA1 = exponentialaverage[10](close)EMA2 = exponentialaverage[40](close)bullish = Close>EMA1 AND Close>EMA2 AND EMA1>EMA2EMA1 = exponentialaverage[10](close)EMA2 = exponentialaverage[40](close)bearish = Close<EMA1 AND Close<EMA2 AND EMA1<EMA21 user thanked author for this post.
maybe try to multiply value of trend indicator * x, in order to have the new value of boxsize, and for a simple calculation
another solution would be to use HullMA for confluence and to minimze latency
Somehow change the boxsize or Francesco last post make it more accurate when to enter the position from simple MA values to see where the trend is. It’s an easier way i guess.
Please post results so we can all see and be happy for you?? 🙂
Also we can check if we got same results as you or do we need to use your settings etc
See pictures of both results and when the trades are taken 🙂 I run same one with 2 diffrent settings. One is with renkotype 3 and boxsize 100 and then otherone is with renkotype 3 and boxsize 200.
Good idea, it’s all developing as we go along.
I agree … downtrends are different than up trends … recently the DJI went down near 1,000 points in a few hours, but many days later we are only about half way back up again!?
Most of us do not find coding easy and what seems like an easy change to say in words can take us hours.
@nonetheless has included the SuperTrend in the code … so we are half way there to trying a different box size for up than down?
Have a go … you may surprise yourself! 🙂
Be sure to let us know please?
The market is crazy right now so hard to get good results with only 100k with 1 sec. I’ve studied programming for 2 years on university so I know the basics but this is a bit diffrent for ”normal” programming languages.
In order to open positions following the trend, i added bullish and bearish conditions to the Paul’s last version, performances up to +33%
Haven’t tried it but I like the idea! In what TF do you add it?
1 user thanked author for this post.
i just compared a version of renko strategy and my strategy on going.. i hope 😉
1 user thanked author for this post.
Maybe that would be great to update value of boxsize with ATR
That a good idea!
What about this. Making boxsize depended on the atr of the green candles, and another one for the red one.
Meaning 2 dynamic boxsizes, both needed to muliply with factor x to make it usefull.
This for green candles.
1234567891011121314151617181920// Calculation of ATR// robertogozzip = 30Bullish = close > openMyTR = max(Range,max(abs(high - close[1]),abs(low - close[1])))IF BarIndex < p THENIF Bullish THENMyATR = MyTRELSEMyATR = MyATR[1]ENDIFELSEIF Bullish THENMyATR = ((MyATR[1] * (p - 1)) + MyTR) / pELSEMyATR = MyATR[1]ENDIFENDIFRETURN MyATR AS "Atr"1 user thanked author for this post.
First you have to add the settings that i’ve posted before in the code; then you have to add the variables into the entry conditions, like this:
1234567891011121314151617181920// entryIf (tradetype=1 or tradetype=2) and tradelong thenif bullish thenif condbuy and not longonmarket thenbuy positionsize contract at markettradecounter=tradecounter+1tradecounterlong=tradecounterlong+1endifendifendifif (tradetype=1 or tradetype=3) and tradeshort thenif bearish thenif condsell and not shortonmarket thensellshort positionsize contract at markettradecounter=tradecounter+1tradecountershort=tradecountershort+1endifendifendifyou can add bullish and bearish whenever you want between the conditions, i just added it into another line for clarity
1 user thanked author for this post.
Interesting yes, thx
in progress in my thinking, for the moment i try to compare both strategy. Mine use volatility indicator including a method around the ATR too.
for the moment, i just tested to reduce the static value of the boxe size, set to 4 instead 20.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Update: Splitted the strategy into two versions, one on 8.00-14.30 with 2.4 spread, and another on 14.30-21.00 with 1.6 spread.
Boxsize, renkotipe, sl, tp and bullish/bearish conditions optimized for both. Results in the images. Position size=0.5
I know that this could be highly overoptimize, but splitting the strategy for the different time ranges could be an idea to better perform following the spread.
You can see the non-splitted version on 2.4 spread on the right
Find exclusive trading pro-tools on 
