gain to loss ratio rules
Forums › ProRealTime English forum › General trading discussions › gain to loss ratio rules
- This topic has 22 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 3 years ago by PeterSt.
-
-
09/17/2020 at 11:08 AM #14452209/17/2020 at 12:10 PM #144535
A low gain to loss ratio can work if you have a decent % of winning trades.
I use a rule of thumb that gain to loss X % of winning trades needs to be around 100 ish (94 to 96 passes muster ! 🙂 )
So 1.6 x 60% = 96 is good!
Also 1.2 x 80% = 96 gives profits over the long term … providing the Algo performance is consistent at minimum 1.2 ish and 80% ish.
Hope above helps?
09/17/2020 at 12:50 PM #14453909/17/2020 at 1:58 PM #14455009/17/2020 at 2:48 PM #144555Don’t delete any of your Algo after what I said above.
Get them on Demo Forward Test and see how they do.
If your Algos meet the rule of 100 – ish above then you be sure to make good profits.
Attached is another that doesn’t meet the rule of 100 but still made a healthy profit since 6 Aug 20.
1 user thanked author for this post.
09/18/2020 at 8:57 AM #14462709/18/2020 at 9:39 AM #14463509/18/2020 at 12:24 PM #14465209/18/2020 at 8:12 PM #144724I do have a few on Real Live but I keep switching them off when I can’t monitor them! 🙂
I manual trade mostly as – until recently – I was always disappointed / didn’t trust Algo performance.
I am waiting for an extended down period to see if my current Algos perform as well during a downtrend as over the last few months (mostly uptrend) … on the DJI which most of mine are on.
1 user thanked author for this post.
01/09/2021 at 3:15 PM #157100Hello GraHal , I see your calculation
I use a rule of thumb that gain to loss X % of winning trades needs to be around 100 ish (94 to 96 passes muster ! 🙂 )
However, I’d like to know the logic around this. Also how many trades should it be backtested on to know it’s a trustworthy system in your opinion?
I’d like to make a list of criteria that every system should pass, which I can also share on this forum, so people can have a minimum standard for their systems. I think that’d be an interesting and heplful thing to do.But for it to happen the logic behind the criteria should also be explained I think. Since you seem quite experienced, I’d like to hear your logic behind the 94 to 96. I’m guessing the higher that number is, the better. And also your opinion about how many trades should be in the backtest. Thankyou.
01/09/2021 at 9:13 PM #157136That should read gain to loss ratio x % of winning trades = 100 ish.
I use above as a quick way to make a decision re (good) performance figures on a Detailed Report.
It’s only rule of thumb. so not a hard and fast rule, and is more rationale than logic, but we need to …
- Win high £££’s per trade when we do win.
OR
2. Win a lot more trades than we lose.
OR
3. Algo might be profitable with a compromise on both 1. and 2.
I like to see 40 to 50 trades before I am comfortable going Live with real money.
01/09/2021 at 9:48 PM #157139Attached is another that doesn’t meet the rule of 100 but still made a healthy profit since 6 Aug 20.
83% in market? Not a fan of Stops? :0 🙂
01/09/2021 at 10:37 PM #157141I’ve got a few that are 99.6% time in market.
I seem to be doing okay with direction reverse strategies (whatever the correct term?)oh I know … always onmarket.
Markets either go up or down and so if my strategy profits more than loses then overall it is profitable.
Okay markets can go sideways, but then not much profit or loss and it’s ready to take that big sudden spike up or down?
01/09/2021 at 10:45 PM #157143Markets either go up or down and so if my strategy profits more than loses then overall it is profitable.
Yeah, im just yanking your chain.
It seems to me like the real hardcore traders run without stops but are super active and able to get out when required. My “problem” is that my algo relies on 24/7 data for the indicators to work and so it scares the bezeesus of out of me to run without any stops, im not sure id sleep! Although in reality, that level of extreme event is so rare i guess its not worth worrying out.
what do you guys think? Stops, no stops? Depends etc?
01/10/2021 at 12:50 AM #157161Depends on timeframe i think?
Having no stops on a 5min timeframe is a surefire way to go bust.
- Win high £££’s per trade when we do win.
-
AuthorPosts
Find exclusive trading pro-tools on