Help coding reference to DAILY bars

• 06/20/2017 at 11:33 AM #38635
  robertogozzi

  I still need some help to reference current/past bars.

  In the pic I’m showing two cases about daily bars (but I think this can apply to any TF, as well):

  A – I want to screen all current bar ranges to be > than the previous closed ones. Are

  IF Range > Range[1] THEN....

  1	IF Range > Range[1] THEN....

  and

  IF Range[0] > Range[1] THEN....

  1	IF Range[0] > Range[1] THEN....

  both correct?

  B – I want to screen all previous closed bar ranges to be > than the second previous closed ones. Is

  IF Range[1] > Range[2] THEN....

  1	IF Range[1] > Range[2] THEN....

  correct?

  I hope I can manage to understand and code ProScreener correctly sooner or later!!! Thank you so much.

   

   

  

  robertogozzi

  Moderator

  Topics: 69

  Replies: 17131

  Been thanked: 4028 times
  06/20/2017 at 12:57 PM #38646
  Nicolas

  Both A and B codes are correct. Do you got some problems with your screener?

  

  Nicolas

  Keymaster

  Topics: 81

  Replies: 20863

  Been thanked: 4773 times
  06/20/2017 at 3:23 PM #38659
  robertogozzi

  I hope now the rules remain in my brain!

  I’ll try again and I’ll let you know if I am still in trouble.

  Thank you so much Nicolas for your invaluable help.

  

  robertogozzi

  Moderator

  Topics: 69

  Replies: 17131

  Been thanked: 4028 times
  06/21/2017 at 12:27 AM #38700
  robertogozzi

  This screener applied to DAILY GbpUsd (and a couple more pairs) chart returns the current RANGE as >= than that of the previous bar, which is not as you can see.

  Value = 0 IF Range[0] > Range[1] THEN Value = 1 ENDIF SCREENER [Value]

  1 2 3 4 5

  Value = 0 IF Range[0] > Range[1] THEN    Value = 1 ENDIF SCREENER [Value]

  What’s wrong?

  Thank you.

   

  

  robertogozzi

  Moderator

  Topics: 69

  Replies: 17131

  Been thanked: 4028 times
  06/21/2017 at 8:35 AM #38710
  Nicolas

  What’s wrong with you? 😀 I got good results this morning with your code..

  

  Nicolas

  Keymaster

  Topics: 81

  Replies: 20863

  Been thanked: 4773 times
  06/21/2017 at 1:10 PM #38733
  robertogozzi

  I see, but my pic did not show good results.

  I tried just a minute ago on OIL 4h TF and still got bad results. The current bar has NOT a greater range than the previous one!

  It’s not the first time I notice strange results and that’s why I don’t rely on screener! This scares me a bit because ProScreener may not be a great issue, but what if ProOrder has similar bugs?

  Anyway, thank you Nicolas, I know it’s not your fault.

  

  robertogozzi

  Moderator

  Topics: 69

  Replies: 17131

  Been thanked: 4028 times
  06/21/2017 at 1:28 PM #38739
  Nicolas

  Did not test it in demo, only with a live PRT-CFD account, have you tested it with your live account too?

  

  Nicolas

  Keymaster

  Topics: 81

  Replies: 20863

  Been thanked: 4773 times
  06/21/2017 at 3:54 PM #38758
  robertogozzi

  I am using that screener on IG live account.

  No longer that 1 hour ago I have experienced a “Server Unavailable” message on ProScreener (while ProOrder was still working fine) for about 30 minutes and now everything seems to work as expected.

  Is PRT likely to have “removed” some unwanted data/bug in the meantime? If yes it would be great if they just say YES, so we know for sure they are doing their best to make PRT better and better and that they listen to customers’ remarks/suggestions.

  Thanks again Nicolas for your help.

  1 user thanked author for this post.

  GraHal

  

  robertogozzi

  Moderator

  Topics: 69

  Replies: 17131

  Been thanked: 4028 times
  06/21/2017 at 5:08 PM #38765
  Nicolas

  Seems related to the IG server then.. You are an IG customer, data problem are linked to them, I think it’s not a platform issue since I didn’t have the issue with PRT-CFD.

  2 users thanked author for this post.

  GraHal, robertogozzi

  

  Nicolas

  Keymaster

  Topics: 81

  Replies: 20863

  Been thanked: 4773 times
• Author
  Posts