Mother of Dragons trading strategy…

Forums ProRealTime English forum ProOrder support Mother of Dragons trading strategy…

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 523 total)
  • #119504

    New Money Management, increases position size by 1 for each 1000 profit, margin is constant at ~13% of funds.

    Insane result, not for the faint hearted…

    #119511

    Correction: due to tiered margins, to keep the requirement at a constant % of funds, position size would have to peak at 55. Slightly less insane and probably better that way.

    #120913

    New improved recipe, now with added vitamins.

    Long and short in one code or separated. Robustness tests for v3.5L and 3.5S are roughly similar as v3.3 – the long is a bit worse, the short is a bit better. WF is fine but I’ve only got 100k to work with so it could still be the mother of all curve-fits.

    Most grateful if someone could run it on 200k to see if it doesn’t completely crash and burn.

     

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    #120933

    I’d tried it but give an error in indicator 4 .

    Therefore I have change it:

    indicator4 = LinearRegressionslope[52](close)

    Because I have not the call Indicator “Moving Average Slope[52,1](close)

    The test in attachement

    #120938

    Thanks for that @Zigo. The OOS is not disastrous but with a 94% win rate it should make more money. The curve doesn’t really get going until late 2018, ie my optimization.

    Might be better with the moving average slope, which is here if you’re interested:

    https://www.prorealcode.com/prorealtime-indicators/moving-average-slope/

     

    #120948

    In order for the screenshots: 3.3, 3.5L,3.5S on 200k.

    I think only 3.3 is acceptable in terms of OOS (also if the initial flat curve is synonymous of an high optimization on 100k as you said); but i tried a robustness test on it (results in attached) and it is not bad! I think it’s worth trying on demo for the next month.

    #120961

    Thanks Francesco — agree that it’s ‘not too bad’ but obviously I was hoping for a better curve. The long and short results are apparently with MM, so a bit misleading, but at least it’s not a bust. At this stage a bit of forward testing is the only thing for it. Thanks again.

    #120962

    If you tell me what variables are worth to optimize i can try to do that for 200k and show you the results 🙂

    #120965

    Problem is, there’s so many of them! — probably too many. My guess is that the exit variables — stop loss, target profit, trailing stop and step, might have a bigger effect than the entry variables. I’d try those first.

    #120981

    Tried to work on exit variables but nothing changed. I think the “problem” is on the entry ones, but they are too many as you said 🙁

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #120992

    Not to worry, I’ll leave it on Demo for a while, see what happens…

    #122905

    Hi…

     

    Bearish and bullish MOD work perfectly.

    I have modified them a little, they are incredible.

     

    I would to Contact you vía email… I am sure they are not the only jewelry You have.

     

    Im gain 7600 pips in Dow Jones in one month.

    And im gain 1600 pips in dax un one month with muy versión of Vectorial Dax.

     

    Thanks!!!

     

     

    #122910

    Hi Fran55, good to know it’s working for you. Here’s a couple of others I finally got around to for the DAX and SP (US500) — collect the whole set.

    I haven’t forward tested either of them yet so let us know how you get on. Money Management is optional.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
    #122942

    Really good strategy, great work @nonetheless and thanks to everyone else who contributed with good codes for MM, TS etc!

    #123003

    @nonetheless : DAX-5m-Mother.of_.Dragons-v1.itf with 200K candles, spread 2.6, MM=0

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 523 total)

Create your free account now and post your request to benefit from the help of the community
Register or Login