Not sure Allen, but all I see is the same as in the other topic (I just replied to) : you attempt to do with too few. Here too I say : maybe I see it wrongly, but all I can see from your well-put pictures is that you’re dealing with in this case 0.1 of 1.089 (which would be 10 cents). That obviously (?) can not exist.
Because it may well be a PRT anomaly, just try all with x 1000. And even x 1000 would be a way low number. BUT sort out decently what the Contract Size is. Is that 100000 to begin with ? (which is in my mind) then be careful. It is still not as much as it looks like (you may lose 0.1% over that, which is 100 only), but for starters it is 1,000,000 times more than you seem to want to work with (100,000 / 0.1).
In addition to my post in the other thread : it may be logic that you can obtain a fraction like 0.1 of a contract size of 100,000 (because IG allows fractions – BUT sort out the minimum !). But you should be aware of the contract size in the first place. And this will never be 1.089 only (or 1.00 as how you would put the order).
Peter
1 user thanked author for this post.