Pathfinder Trading System
- This topic has 1,834 replies, 139 voices, and was last updated 1 year ago by
.
-
Big overall drawdowns make me feel so shite that I question what am I even doing this … if it’s not fun why bother?
1 user thanked author for this post.
Big overall drawdowns make me feel so shite
It is an ironic fact of life that if you start with a lot of money then making a lot of money is easier. Anyone could have made a lot of money over the years if they can cope with massive draw downs. Just keep holding and buying more as the market collapses and ignore the number of negative zeros on your account balance and wait for things to start going up again.
However for those with a smaller bank balance finding a strategy that fits their needs is far harder . Lots of big profits with hardly any draw down is what they need and that is a very challenging strategy to come up with.
Bit off topic so I will drop this subject now! 🙂
Big overall drawdowns make me feel so shite
It is an ironic fact of life that if you start with a lot of money then making a lot of money is easier. Anyone could have made a lot of money over the years if they can cope with massive draw downs. Just keep holding and buying more as the market collapses and ignore the number of negative zeros on your account balance and wait for things to start going up again. However for those with a smaller bank balance finding a strategy that fits their needs is far harder . Lots of big profits with hardly any draw down is what they need and that is a very challenging strategy to come up with. Bit off topic so I will drop this subject now!
story of my trading life :-\
Don’t worry, in the next version, the bad days will be optimized away…
I have to admit I had to smile about that comment even so my profits seem to melt away with Pathfinder recently.
But I still want to highlight that the year 2017 ,when we started (Reiner started 🙂 ), was very successful. Pathfinder (Backtest) was very profitable because it starts from 2010 and from then onward is was more or less a constant way up. We have unfortunately no comparison to significant corrections like it happened at the beginning of the year and still ongoing.
We have to keep in mind Pathfinder is specially profitable in trending bull markets. (Same applies for the Swing System)
Personally, I reduced all my positions for now and wait until we enter another bull trend.I still believe in the system but we have to evaluate what it can and what it can’t.
Kind regards
1 user thanked author for this post.
Don’t worry, in the next version, the bad days will be optimized away…
I have to admit I had to smile about that comment even so my profits seem to melt away with Pathfinder recently. But I still want to highlight that the year 2017 ,when we started (Reiner started
), was very successful. Pathfinder (Backtest) was very profitable because it starts from 2010 and from then onward is was more or less a constant way up. We have unfortunately no comparison to significant corrections like it happened at the beginning of the year and still ongoing. We have to keep in mind Pathfinder is specially profitable in trending bull markets. (Same applies for the Swing System) Personally, I reduced all my positions for now and wait until we enter another bull trend. I still believe in the system but we have to evaluate what it can and what it can’t. Kind regardsYou need to remember that we already had a big correction in 2015, bigger than the current one (30% down from the top in DAX), and the pathfinder backtest performed well (i.e., was well optimized) for this period.
In total, when we leave all position sizing away, I count at least 9 adaptable parameters (all stop loss and take profit parameters not considered).
Now look at the result when you take all position sizing and all the seasonal stuff out, which add a lot more of additional adaptable and optimizable parameters.
Position size in the upper equity curve is always 1 for pathfinder DAX 4H V7 2018. The lower curve is the original system with all adaptable and optimized parameters :
Sorry, the upper equity curve in the post above is wrong. I made a mistake in position sizing.
So here is once again a comparison between variable position sizes and position size = 1 for the older V6B1 version and the latest 2018 version. Upper curves are with position size = 1, lower curves are with original variable position sizes (seasonal adjustment, etc.).
2018 version :
V6B1 :
For both versions, results with position size =1 are almost identical. The 2018 version has re-optimized position sizing and therefore yields are higher.
Once again, we can see what a difference lots of adaptable parameters can make in hindsight.
What I learned again : it’s difficult to code or to post with two children running around and asking : Paapaaa, when will you ?….
Find exclusive trading pro-tools on 
