If you didn’t Carl I would have. I think it’s more than fair for you given the tone of the thread to show such a stellar month. Well done, after 3 months DD you’ve earnt it. I’ve been watching it all unfold. Also big ups to you for the ability to face your youtube crowd (what was left haha) and tell it how it is, that can’t have been an easy stream for you.
Interestingly as I believe it is valid to the previous conversation, the bot account I posted also recovered well and the negative correlation I had pegged is in full play once again. Now I trust the pair to move forward and hopefully get more size on organically.
Which brings me to the point of our earlier trading conversation. It is a myth that psychology is somewhat removed from algo trading. After doing this for a little time now it’s clear that all the same errors can be made as manual trading. So for individual bots or a portfolio one must be prepared for the equity curve journey ahead and sized to what they can stomach. For me it was half the size I thought. Had I not built the bots myself, I don’t know where that conviction can come from. If I was to run third party software then I would study them meticulously and prepare my mind before switching them on. There is one single biggest thing I have taken away from algo trading is about managing expectations. It’s not so easy thinking in sample size when there are bills to pay. Once one gets away from get rich quick then they can have the spoils of wealth over time. Don’t get me wrong though, PeterSt I think is spot on with a benchmark should be around 100% pa and I only have one that can do that risk adjusted and it took me 9mths to find it. But what is said? If you aim for the stars and miss you might land on the moon! Well that’s just fine too.
A member here, shut them off for safety. I moved to half size on commencement of the second stage DD of my pair and you sir, rode into the sunset like a cowboy drinking pina coladas.