“ProScreener” and “Probuilder” deliver different results with identical code

• 06/21/2024 at 5:59 PM #234202
  Vagus_Lux

  hello colleagues,

  to show the facts, i add the last 200 close values in both the builder and the screener.

  Unfortunately, I get different results and have no idea why.
  I’d like to discuss this with you. Maybe some of you knows a work around.

  As in the attachments, the code for both surroundings just with // or without //:

  //SreenerTest
  //DefParam DRAWONLASTBARONLY=True

  v1 = close
  v2 = summation[200](v1)
  v3 = round(v2)
  //DRAWTEXT(” #v3#”, barindex, v1, Dialog, Bold, 16)

  //Return v1
  SCREENER (v3 as “v3”)

   

   

   

  

  Vagus_Lux

  Participant

  Topics: 6

  Replies: 13

  Been thanked: 1 time
  06/22/2024 at 6:33 AM #234208
  Vagus_Lux

  Additional information: For this test, the same data (Cboe) was used on both the screener and the builder side.

  

  Vagus_Lux

  Participant

  Topics: 6

  Replies: 13

  Been thanked: 1 time
  06/22/2024 at 10:46 AM #234215
  robertogozzi

  I have tested it on both FX pairs and some assets and it works like a charm (see attached pic).

  It may be due to a different updating timing live. Since today it is Saturday and the markets are closed, this is not an issue. Try to run it today.

   

   

  1 user thanked author for this post.

  Vagus_Lux

  

  robertogozzi

  Moderator

  Topics: 69

  Replies: 17130

  Been thanked: 4026 times
  06/22/2024 at 1:51 PM #234219
  Vagus_Lux

  Thank you for your prompt reply.

  It looks like we are one step ahead, you are absolutely right that FX pairs match.

  But could you please also test “Italy 40 [Cobe]”, as almost none of my values currently match.

  

  Vagus_Lux

  Participant

  Topics: 6

  Replies: 13

  Been thanked: 1 time
  06/23/2024 at 3:11 PM #234247
  JS

  Hi,

  I tested your indicator/screener on the Italian stock market and there are no differences between the indicator and the screener (not even in demo) …

  It may be that you are using a version (EOD version) that has less historical data than necessary… (try lowering 200 to, say, 100 or 50 and see if the same differences occur) …

  

  JS

  Participant

  Topics: 26

  Replies: 1701

  Been thanked: 768 times
  06/23/2024 at 6:06 PM #234253
  Vagus_Lux

  Thank you for your test / suggestions and the hope that this should work for me too.

  I have tested your suggestions, but unfortunately without a solution to my problem. Regardless of how many historical data I use 50 or 200 the difference remains. However, if I only use 50, the difference is smaller, as expected. I ran the test both in paper mode and in real money mode, with the same difference.

  

  Vagus_Lux

  Participant

  Topics: 6

  Replies: 13

  Been thanked: 1 time
  06/23/2024 at 6:22 PM #234257
  JS

  Hi,

  The difference lies in the use of different data…

  Screeners always works with “real” data, i.e. data that has been adjusted after dividend…

  The indicator is currently using data that has NOT been adjusted after dividend…

  Solution: activate the option “adjust data after dividend” …

  4 users thanked author for this post.

  GraHal, Iván, robertogozzi, Vagus_Lux

  

  JS

  Participant

  Topics: 26

  Replies: 1701

  Been thanked: 768 times
  06/23/2024 at 7:21 PM #234264
  Vagus_Lux

  Wow, that’s the solution!!!

  I am very grateful for your support!

  1 user thanked author for this post.

  JS

  

  Vagus_Lux

  Participant

  Topics: 6

  Replies: 13

  Been thanked: 1 time
• Author
  Posts