ProScreener Gaps alcistas

• 11/30/2021 at 5:48 PM #182543
  Principiante

  Como detectar gaps, pero solo los gaps alcistas, he probado con

  //PRC_Breakaway Gaps screener | screener

  //03.10.2016

  //Nicolas @ http://www.prorealcode.com

  //Sharing ProRealTime knowledge

  hh = highest[10](high)

  ll = lowest[10](low)

  c = open[0]

  vol = Volume/Volume[1]>1.5 and average[90](volume)>100000

  breakup = variation>=3 and c>hh[1]

  breakdown = variation<=-3 and c<ll[1]

  SCREENER [vol and (breakup or breakdown)] (Variation as “variation”)

  Pero salen tanto gaps alcistas como bajistas y solo quiero los gaps alcistas

  GRACIAS

  

  Principiante

  Participant

  Topics: 4

  Replies: 10

  Been thanked: 0 times
  12/01/2021 at 9:12 AM #182564
  JC_Bywan

  Solo gaps alcistas:

  //PRC_Breakaway Gaps screener | screener //03.10.2016 //Nicolas @ http://www.prorealcode.com //Sharing ProRealTime knowledge hh = highest[10](high) //ll = lowest[10](low) c = open[0] vol = Volume/Volume[1]>1.5 and average[90](volume)>100000 breakup = variation>=3 and c>hh[1] //breakdown = variation<=-3 and c<ll[1] SCREENER [vol and breakup] (Variation as "variation")

  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

  //PRC_Breakaway Gaps screener | screener   //03.10.2016   //Nicolas @ http://www.prorealcode.com   //Sharing ProRealTime knowledge   hh = highest[10](high)   //ll = lowest[10](low)   c = open[0]   vol = Volume/Volume[1]>1.5 and average[90](volume)>100000   breakup = variation>=3 and c>hh[1]   //breakdown = variation<=-3 and c<ll[1]   SCREENER [vol and breakup] (Variation as "variation")

   

  

  JC_Bywan

  Moderator

  Topics: 20

  Replies: 2649

  Been thanked: 915 times
  12/01/2021 at 9:16 AM #182565
  robertogozzi

  Un GAP alcista es cuando la apertura es mayor que el máximo anterior.
  Ahi esta:

  c1 = open > high[1] SCREENER[c1]

  1 2	c1 = open > high[1] SCREENER[c1]

  

  robertogozzi

  Moderator

  Topics: 69

  Replies: 17138

  Been thanked: 4032 times
  12/01/2021 at 9:16 AM #182566
  robertogozzi

  ¡Dos es mejor que uno! 🙂

  1 user thanked author for this post.

  JC_Bywan

  

  robertogozzi

  Moderator

  Topics: 69

  Replies: 17138

  Been thanked: 4032 times
  12/01/2021 at 8:16 PM #182647
  Principiante

  Gracias, el segundo no funion, pero el priemro si, de todas forams gracias a los dos

  

  Principiante

  Participant

  Topics: 4

  Replies: 10

  Been thanked: 0 times
• Author
  Posts