This may show the culprit :
1st pic, top one is V12, bottom one is V11. Both ate zoomed for showing the same time span. Both were originally loaded with 100 bars.
2nd pic show it some other way around : Both charts are zoomed just far enough that the bars sustain their color(-filled) width. Both clearly show different. Also, the empty space in the top one (V12) is larger. It thus consumes more space.
Would I know further zoom in the top one (V12) to show the same time span again, then we receive the 3rd pic.
Personally I can’t wrap my mind about this, but everybody claiming tiny small candles is now suddenly right.
If you consider that both the first and the third situation try to compress as many readable bars in the given space, then it is clear V12 requires way more space. And, I did not notice that because I just make all equal in readable form. So my priority is readable for comparison. And not “the most shown” for time period.
So again, looking closely you can see that the top one (V12, blue) in the first pic shows more white space. This means that my V11 (bottom one, green) was set unnecessary wide in order to be compatible with the V12 version.
Something else is that I seem to have noticed that at each restart of the platform another pixel is eaten somewhere. Forms less and less can contain their ever set content; I must make the forms wider and wider. But maybe I am dreaming this.
.
