The best trading strategies of PRC for Prorealtime – Backtests update & Rankings

Forums ProRealTime English forum General trading discussions The best trading strategies of PRC for Prorealtime – Backtests update & Rankings

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 64 total)
  • #216932

    🏁 StratSENTINEL Signal 🏁

     

    🟢 We are going LIVE with this version of Timehunter

    https://www.prorealcode.com/topic/strategy-barhunter-dax-v1p/page/13/#post-123072

     

    👉 If you want to know more about StratSENTINEL and why we launch this ** stars strategy now

    https://market.prorealcode.com/product/stratsentinel-daily-licence/

    https://best-trading-algos.com/

    #216937
    reb
    #216941

    with some modifications, but still without stoploss

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #216954
    reb

    hello Fifi

    What code did you use ?

    #216980

    Hello @reb,
    I’ve added the following code to the input condition

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    #216998

    Hi @fifi743 @reb
    This is great; thanks guys for your inputs; this hereunder strategy modified which is better than the first one will be added and monitored on best-trading-algos.com

    The backtest is just impressive ^^^; never seen a 99% ratio of win ^^^^

    Please continue to post here all the stategies that you want me to monitor scatered in all the threads; 


    @reb

    thanks for your feed abck on our work ^^^^;
    FYI, this hereunder strategy is already listed:-) it’s a * star (one star)  performer unfortunetly

    https://www.prorealcode.com/prorealtime-trading-strategies/heiken-ashi-trading-system-with-rsi-dax-mini-nasdaq-mini-ita40-min on Dax

     

     

     

    #217021

    The backtest is just impressive ^^^; never seen a 99% ratio of win ^^^^

    Less than one star from me. 😉 And still subtract one star for the lacking SL.

    The trades/revenue you see in the 1st attachment could be of any substance. But spread over 1,5 years ? forget it. You can’t even by bread from it. But this is okay of course and to each his own. However, the fun really fades if you see what you need to do for it. That shows in attachment #2.

    I post this, not to rain on someone’s parade, but to show to people how to interpret Systems which look to good to be true.

    A kind of positive (though subjective) remark : This System is super decent and it doesn’t even require a SL.  But on the other hand, that’s exactly where the tradeoff is hidden : it is so decent that it trades so few times that nothing can be made of it.

    🙂

    #217025
    reb

    Just one thing to add

    I am using it from beginning 2022, and no discrepancy between Backtest and real account
    At this stage 2 494 points won,  100% W, 134 trades

     

    Thks @samsampop, the creator who unfortunately is no longer on this website

    3 users thanked author for this post.
    #217030

    100% W, 134 trades

    Wait, so why do I have 9 trades only then (in Backtest but that should not matter if all is right) ?
    Do you use another TimeFrame ?
    OK, I am doing this on IB. I wouldn’t think this matters for this System ?

    #217035
    OK, again :

    The backtest is just impressive ^^^; never seen a 99% ratio of win ^^^^

    Right !

    Now on to the why of the difference. I hope I used the correct instrument on IB ?
    Btw, I used the $2 cash here (could not find the $1 quickly).

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #217039

    Hello,
    You can’t compare IG to IB, they don’t have the same flow.
    The algorithm was designed for IG

    4 users thanked author for this post.
    #217042

    IB and IG are totally incomparable.  See the first picture for about the same time span. IB starts at 15:30 (Amsterdam) and ends at 22:00. IG starts at 00:00 and ends at 23:00.

    In this DJI case there’s even sufficient volatility outside trading hours.

    So … Peter should have taken the IB DJI Future because IB’s DJI Index is only active during RTH.
    This DJI Future coincidentally does not work out for the best because it runs into the “Zombie” protection (500 bars) once – and in bad shape of the trade. The IG Index also runs into that protection but with a coincidental very low loss.

    So a SL or other measure is still needed and that will make the win rate lower. Of course you can also make the zombie protection more weak (like 1000 bars) but hey …
    I did that in the 4th attachment and we see that it is not quite for the better. So it is still a bit of too good to be true, but you must run unlucky in order to be bothered by that. 😉

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #217095
    reb

    100% W, 134 trades

    Wait, so why do I have 9 trades only then (in Backtest but that should not matter if all is right) ?

    Do you use another TimeFrame ?

    OK, I am doing this on IB. I wouldn’t think this matters for this System ?

    My mistake, it isn’t 134 but 45 trades (I read the wrong line on my xls file)

    #217128

    Sorry if i’m wrong, but the only way to exit an order in loss is located here:

    Allow an order to exit in loss ONLY if it has last for at least 500 bars of 15-minutes: 96 days!

    So it’s not the entries that generate a positive result, it is the way the losses are handled: bet on price will go up someday! Which is most of the time with indices as DOW, but what about the drawdown during bear market?

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #217129
    JS

    Hi,

    500 bars of 15 minutes = 7500 minutes = 125 hours = 5,2 days (not 96 days?)

    1 user thanked author for this post.
Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 64 total)

Create your free account now and post your request to benefit from the help of the community
Register or Login