The screener does not take the growing MACD into account

Forums › ProRealTime English forum › ProScreener support › The screener does not take the growing MACD into account

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • 03/21/2018 at 1:04 PM #65983
    Meta Signals Pro

    Hi there,

    I am trying to have a very simple screener identifying stocks with this configuration:

    • oversold Weekly/Daily Stoch (the K% line)
    • growing Weekly/Daily MACD (not the Signal line)

    But for some reason, it does not take the parameter of the MACD into account ;

    Does anybody see why?

    Thanks !!

    Chris
    <pre class=”lang:probuilder decode:true “>REM Condition 1: Stoch en survente et en croissance + MACD weekly < 0 et croissant
    TIMEFRAME(WEEKLY)
    KW=STOCHASTIC[14,3]
    StochWeek = KW<25
    CroissStochWeek = KW>(KW)[1]
    MW=MACD[12,26,9]
    CroissMACDWeek = MW>(MW)[1]
    MiniVolume = volume>10000

    REM Condition 2: Stochastic daily < 25
    TIMEFRAME(DAILY)
    KD=STOCHASTIC[14,3]
    StochDay = KD<25
    CroissMACDDay = MACD>(MACD)[1]
    CroissStochDay = KD>(KD)[1]

    SCREENER[StochWeek and CroissStochWeek and CroissMACDWeek and MiniVolume and StochDay AND CroissMACDDay and CroissStochDay]

     

    03/21/2018 at 1:34 PM #65988
    robertogozzi

    The line

    is incomplete since it lacks due parameters embedded within brackets, didn’t ProScreener warn you?

     

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    avatar Meta Signals Pro
    03/21/2018 at 5:36 PM #66006
    Meta Signals Pro

    Hi Robert,

    Thanks for your reply; no warning popped up.

    I don’t get what is improper to be honnest (keep learning the code);

    Is this a more correct coding? Thanks

     

    03/21/2018 at 5:41 PM #66007
    robertogozzi

    I don’t know what you ask about Macd, the second code is different from the first one!

    The first one had an incorrect line, how could you run it?

    03/21/2018 at 6:00 PM #66008
    Meta Signals Pro

    To me the second version expressed the same idea of a MACD line (not the signal) being growing as a condition; I assure you there was no error mentioned in the first code;

    Can you precise what exactly was wrong for my knowledge? Thanks

    03/21/2018 at 6:45 PM #66010
    robertogozzi

    Macd cannot be written MACD, it’s an error. It should be written

    as you did on the Weekly TF, that’s why I can’t figure out how it could run. I copied it to my ProScreener and I was warned about the error!

    In your second version, there is no reference to the MACD being < 0, perhaps you should add, on the Weekly/Daily (where you want to check it) chart

    As it is now, applied to ALL instruments, on a 1-minute TF, it does not return any occurrency.

     

     

     

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    avatar Meta Signals Pro
    03/22/2018 at 12:10 AM #66032
    Meta Signals Pro

    Here is the code working now !

    thanks for your help Robert !

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    avatar robertogozzi
  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)

Find exclusive trading pro-tools on ProRealCode Marketplace

Similar topics:
mlutiple ut – does not take the large one
the screener does not show the same values that the indicator
“multi time frame macd divergences” screener
accountid does not have permission for epic + locale combination
backtesting does not work which a great amount of time units
can not log into prorealtime
change the macd indicator to zero lag macd
is it possible to convert this strategy into a screener?
it is not possible to run prorealtime without a cfd or spread betting account
position does not exist

Create your free account now and post your request to benefit from the help of the community
Register or Login