Discussing the strategy VECTORIAL DAX (M5)

Forums ProRealTime English forum ProOrder support Discussing the strategy VECTORIAL DAX (M5)

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 1,261 total)
  • #106069

    Good morning, in case I miss something that I have not taken into account, why don’t you use version 4.2? For me it is the one that gives the best results with a very tight DD. At the end of July I put in real and I am getting very good results, attached screenshot.

    #106200

    According to my back test, V5 is better with less DD.

    In addition, it has performed really well since it was made in April

    #106202

    I use size 0.5.

    Even with 1 contract, V5 has lower DD..

    But does V2 make a bigger profit?

    #106265

    @Stefanb what settings are you running? usetimecriteria etc?

    #106384

    I’ve just finished reading this thread – looks like a great strategy.

    I’m still finding my way around PRT and IG and would like to confirm something. Regarding the backtesting done by various people above, is that on the Germany 30 ‘CFD’ account or ‘Spreadbet’ account (and is there a way to tell from the posted results)?

    Thanks.

     

     

    #106385

    @nfulcher

    CFD Germany30 with IG Markets.

     

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #106394

    Good, when I wrote I could not study version 5 quietly, but this is better, having a drowdown less than laitad that 4.2 is preferable to activate version 5.0 with 2 contracts to activate 4.2, since it would take less money and earn plus. Thanks for putting backtest with 200,000 candles.

    #106397

    @Nacho

    Backtest with 200k candles / PositionSize = 1 / Spread = 1 with these variables :

    once tradeschedule = 0 //[0]=full; [1]=morning; [2]=lunch; [3]=afternoon
    once resetcounter = 1 //[0]=default; [1]=experiment (both connected by position criteria)once enablesl = 1 // stoploss
    once enablept = 0 // profit target
    once enablets = 1 // trailing stop
    once enablebb = 0 // bollingerband exit (add bb as indicator to have it visually) (all can be combined)

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #106403
    AE

    Hi @Balmora74

    Thanks you for this fantastic strategy. Two questions:

    1. Which variables do you recomend to check in order to fit to the market (maybe the angle? the MAs?)
    2. How many ofen do you recomend check this variables?

    Thanks again!

    #106405

    Thanks @AE

    QUESTION 1

    You can play with :

    ONCE PeriodeA = 10
    ONCE nbChandelierA= 15
    ONCE PeriodeB = 20
    ONCE nbChandelierB= 35
    ONCE lag = 1.5

    and also the variable “pente”

    In order to help you in this work you can had these 2 indicators

    See attached piece for the graphical configuration of these indicators.

    For your question number 2 = It’s a good question 🙂

     

     

     

     

     

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #106409

    @nacho

    Backtest with 200k candles / PositionSize = 1 / Spread = 1 with these variables :

    once tradeschedule = 0 //[0]=full; [1]=morning; [2]=lunch; [3]=afternoon

    once resetcounter = 1 //[0]=default; [1]=experiment (both connected by position criteria)once enablesl = 1 // stoploss

    once enablept = 0 // profit target

    once enablets = 1 // trailing stop

    once enablebb = 0 // bollingerband exit (add bb as indicator to have it visually) (all can be combined)

    I’ve backtested this tonight using 100,000 and got the following results. This is nowhere near the 95% gain you got above. Is this due to the backtest period.

    I’ve used the following variables:

     

    #106442

    Google traduction :

    Hello Balmora74,

    thank you again for your strategy and the idea of ​​giving the corresponding indicators helps to better understand it.

    I test this strategy in real and demo, actually I also find some trade differences if the trailing stop is affected at the same time or not.

    Moreover, I was able to test strategies in M1 and the problem can be very important with SL affected in real while demo we did a TP.

    In demo there are also overnight and overweek charges that are not taken into account.

    Regarding the stop follower, I noticed that often the gain realized is well below the maximum gain possible on a position (in the table MFE).

    Is there the possibility to modify the variables of this trailing stop which is based on the ATR?

    Have a good day.

    #106448

    @tba69

    Only english speaking in english forums sections of the website please.

    #106473

    I have had different versions of this code live but now I am considering increasing size of contracts.

    Have some € 100 in profit on this code and might as well bet the “profit”

    Now I use v5.

    Will start with 3 contracts.

    Do you have the code live or on demo?

    #106477

    @Stefanb … might be better to wait until you are £1000 in profit and then bet £100 of the free money?

    That way you will still be happy even if it goes wrong?? 🙂

    I am still in Demo with Vectorials, but I will be  going Live as soon as PRT v11 is provided by IG.

    If anybody wants to enter performance in the Log below for any version – Forward Test on Demo or Live using live data – then we may all help each other?

    Forward Test – Sys Perf

     

     

    1 user thanked author for this post.
Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 1,261 total)

Create your free account now and post your request to benefit from the help of the community
Register or Login