Discussing the strategy VECTORIAL DAX (M5)

Forums ProRealTime English forum ProOrder support Discussing the strategy VECTORIAL DAX (M5)

Viewing 15 posts - 1,066 through 1,080 (of 1,261 total)
  • #148647

    The “DAX 10s -vectoril v3p5 v2” is crashing for me when it takes a position, it just did. Does anyone else encounter the same problem ?

    Mine says running and the last was position took was at 9:13 that exited at 9:59.

    #148648

    @Artemois,
    mine is running, but it didn’t take a position. The last one exited at 10h18 (french time)

    #148650

    @paisantrader Thnx I see you left the stop-loss at 2%. That’s too much for a 10s timeframe I think.

    Fortunately if it’s changed to 0.4 or 0.5% it has no or very minimal impact on results, that’s on the dow version.

    I realize that I was too focused on the trailing stop and wasn’t 100% how it worked. Thought it set it already from the start and the regular SL was there just to set a default value. But after a test, I see a big difference. Thank you for pointing out our mistakes, much appreciated!

    2% -> 0.4% doubled the profit.

    #148652

    @Paisantrader can you post your itf files? 🙂

    #148673

    @Paisantrader can you post your itf files? 🙂

    What I posted above was just sll and sls. Changed it from 2 to 0.4.

    I’m running 3 version on Dow today, since I’m quite sure that what worked yesterday, will not work today or at least far from yesterdays numbers.

    1. The one already posted here
    2. Optimized before opening today and 100k bars
    3. Optimized before opening today and 5k bars, roughly 22:00 – before opening

    Just a little testing for my own sake 🙂

    #148680

    Hi, so if there’s a stoploss of 0.4 or 0.5% why not use as backup an atr stoploss or/and profit target.

    I prefer to leave the original setting for the % stoploss with set the set command intact

    Here’s a quick code.  I’ve doubt if it should close[0] or close[1].

     

    #148715

    Hi, so if there’s a stoploss of 0.4 or 0.5% why not use as backup an atr stoploss or/and profit target.

    I prefer to leave the original setting for the % stoploss with set the set command intact

    Here’s a quick code. I’ve doubt if it should close[0] or close[1].

    Thank you, much appreciated. I see there’s similarities to the one in use right now . I’ll test them side by side to compare.

     

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #148769

    I haven’t put the ones in 10s in demo or live, please keep me updated 😉

    #149088

    I stopped the 10s strategies on wenesday. The algos take too many positions and i can’t understand some of them.
    I prefer launch algos wich run on 5min or 3min timeframes.

    #149735

    Hey @Tanou I haven’t put any of the systems live though I have compiled the last 12 trading days backtest if it can help. Here’s the file

    #149737

    @BobOgden, that’s a fantastic job! 😃

     

    However, this system doesn’t seems to perform well on 10s for now.. I optimised it for 3 minutes at the enhance.

    on what schedule did you ran it as I see that you’ve wrote 15/15:30 to 22?

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #149794

    @Tanou it should be the same as the original code, only changed to fit EU time (well, at least I think, I’m not even sure it does fit EU time now).

    I’ll try and update it in two week’s time to get a full month or so. As you said, it has performed pretty baldy lately, especially on US election day

    The text box is just to remind me to check whether DJ opening hours wouldn’t be better than from 5:00 to 23:00

    Positionsize is 0.2 btw

    I’ve been running the 3min version, hopefully it does well 🙂

    #149806

    Has anyone tried using this as a mean reversing strategy?

    #149937

    Here’s a version which uses the heuristics engine, but not aggressively.

    The way I used the heuristics engine & modified it, while it works in the backtest, i’am not convinced about using it. The engine can easily be switched off.

    I had it with he on/off running side by side for a short while and results were identical,  but didn’t look into it too much.

    Actually I had already deleted this version because it grew too big and curvefitted.

     

     

    6 users thanked author for this post.
    #149947

    @Paul:

    That’s amazing.
    Appreciate the tremendous amount of effort you into it.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
Viewing 15 posts - 1,066 through 1,080 (of 1,261 total)

Create your free account now and post your request to benefit from the help of the community
Register or Login